Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1580

reference
970-tree-1
name
1580
tree-preservation-order

undefined

970-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.002327 50.859371)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.002298 50.859368,-1.002300 50.859374,-1.002304 50.859379,-1.002318 50.859386,-1.002326 50.859387,-1.002335 50.859386,-1.002350 50.859379,-1.002354 50.859374,-1.002355 50.859369,-1.002354 50.859363,-1.002350 50.859358,-1.002344 50.859354,-1.002327 50.859351,-1.002318 50.859351,-1.002310 50.859354,-1.002304 50.859358,-1.002298 50.859368)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL